jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefan Guggisberg" <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Unable to define node type without child nodes in CND
Date Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:28:05 GMT
hi david

On 11/10/06, David Moss <david.moss@infoflow.co.uk> wrote:
> Ah, think I've got it.
>
> I was under the impression (from reading other examples on the net) that the
> namespace declarations should be made for each node type, not just once at
> the top.
>
> Multiple namespace declarations work fine, except where a node does not
> contain a child node definition:
>
> <namespace= 'http://www.mynamespace.co.uk/namespace'>
> <nt = 'http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0'>
> [namespace:document] > nt:file
>    - namespace:name (string) mandatory
>
> [namespace:document2] > nt:file
>    - namespace:name (string) mandatory
>
> Works fine, but
>
>
> <namespace= 'http://www.mynamespace.co.uk/namespace'>
> <nt = 'http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0'>
> [namespace:document] > nt:file
>    - namespace:name (string) mandatory
>
> <namespace= 'http://www.mynamespace.co.uk/namespace'>
> <nt = 'http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0'>
> [namespace:document2] > nt:file
>    - namespace:name (string) mandatory
>
>
> Does not.
>
> Is there a bug here?

the BNF in http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api-1/org/apache/jackrabbit/core/nodetype/compact/CompactNodeTypeDefReader.html
defines:

[...]
cnd ::= {ns_mapping | node_type_def}
[...]

hence it's either a bug in the BNF or in the cnd parser. feel free to
post a jira issue.

thanks
stefan

>
> D.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tobias.strasser@gmail.com [mailto:tobias.strasser@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Tobias Bocanegra
> Sent: 10 November 2006 16:49
> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Unable to define node type without child nodes in CND
>
> hi david,
> i quickly tried the following example:
>
> <namespace= 'http://www.mynamespace.co.uk/namespace'>
> <nt = 'http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0'>
> [namespace:document] > nt:file
>    - namespace:name (string) mandatory
>
> [namespace:document2] > nt:file
>    - namespace:name (string) mandatory
>
> which worked for me.
> maybe you can provide your entire cnd?
>
> regards, toby
>
>
> On 11/10/06, David Moss <david.moss@infoflow.co.uk> wrote:
> > Am I correct in thinking that it's not possible to define a node type
> > that only contains properties (i.e. no child nodes) in CND?
> >
> > I've tried:
> >
> > <namespace= 'http://www.mynamespace.co.uk/namespace'>
> > <nt = 'http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0'> [namespace:document] > nt:file
> >     - namespace:name (string) mandatory
> >
> > but I get an error 'Missing '[' delimiter for beginning of node type
> > name ...' when the parser comes to processing the next node in my list
> > of definitions.
> >
> > however, if I do something like:
> >
> > <namespace= 'http://www.mynamespace.co.uk/namespace'>
> > <nt = 'http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0'> [namespace:document] > nt:file
> >     - namespace:name (string) mandatory
> >    + namespace:arbitraryNode (namespace:arbNodeType)
> >
> > it works.
> >
> > Have I done something obviously wrong here, or is it actually not
> > possible to define a node type with no child nodes?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> >
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------< tobias.bocanegra@day.com >---
> Tobias Bocanegra, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001 Basel T
> +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97
> -----------------------------------------------< http://www.day.com >---
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

Mime
View raw message