Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 12588 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2006 16:29:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2006 16:29:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 71906 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2006 16:29:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 71896 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2006 16:29:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 71887 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2006 16:29:49 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:29:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:29:47 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GZrol-0006cZ-1X for users@jackrabbit.apache.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:29:27 -0700 Message-ID: <6858943.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT) From: JavaJ To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Restoring a node after move In-Reply-To: <8be731880610170349i5dd8dea8q6ce9e6ca7c0acd1c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: ponfar99@yahoo.com References: <6846023.post@talk.nabble.com> <8be731880610170349i5dd8dea8q6ce9e6ca7c0acd1c@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N so the "name" of a node is not part of its own state but the state of its parent? Tobias Bocanegra wrote: > > you would need to restore /a/b/c/d since a move modifies the state of > the parent(s). > > regards, toby > > On 10/17/06, JavaJ wrote: >> >> Say you have a Node F at: /A/B/D/F with version 1.0, then you decide to >> move >> it to /A/B/D/E (basically renaming it to "E") and version it 1.1. What >> happens if you restore the Node to version 1.0? Will it's name be "F" or >> "E"? >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Restoring-a-node-after-move-tf2456196.html#a6846023 >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > -----------------------------------------< tobias.bocanegra@day.com >--- > Tobias Bocanegra, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001 Basel > T +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97 > -----------------------------------------------< http://www.day.com >--- > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Restoring-a-node-after-move-tf2456196.html#a6858943 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.