Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ted.roeloffzen@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.230 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=AYnoIqbCJLZvUHN2+dBEeS7uTtDARQtmt0giTtrUORzgrhbT1Ag97zh4xtpWPuOQMdfQhJ8E77jWhuVv9mp8SQvBOEGAEZMcCsLCo0ycGs1F//xyc+quwJ7DQ6j2J/JrMl+rf7Zl96XBFvwV0F5iVVUVZSp7OmdHEBsbLhmISqk=
Message-ID: <2f35a2640610160346u743928fv2d97cd658e832e78@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:46:26 +0200
From: "Ted Roeloffzen" <ted.roeloffzen@gmail.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: is jackrabbit Threadsafe?
In-Reply-To: <c6f400460610160341l50dce6eei7259c47599c72c05@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_74358_9980963.1160995586436"
References: <2f35a2640610160159m4fc9471cn7d8c92400fe15dee@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8be731880610160225n6bea2674rad528239431c9d92@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2f35a2640610160238j41077cf1j212d65b7bfd1aaae@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c6f400460610160310j2be73ac1v37cf6899ef4437b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2f35a2640610160315w33de6c7dvd7241deb7dce5c19@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c6f400460610160341l50dce6eei7259c47599c72c05@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_74358_9980963.1160995586436
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

So how would you do it?


On 10/16/06, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/16/06, Ted Roeloffzen <ted.roeloffzen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So we don't have to create a variable for the JackRabbit session in the
> > HTTP-session,
>
> I would say that this is in fact not recommended. Imagine what happens
> with 2 concurrent requests that are using the same HttpSession? Is the
> JCR Session still used in a thread safe manner?
>
> ./alex
> --
> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
>
> > but we can use it in a request-cycle?? We are now using a
> > simple Abstract class en getting the session from it.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/16/06, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/16/06, Ted Roeloffzen <ted.roeloffzen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > So when using it in a Web-application, every HTTP-session has to
> have
> > > its
> > > > own JackRabbit-session. So then it would be threadsafe?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think you should think about it in request-scope and not on Http
> > > session scope. Only request-response cycles are guaranteed to happen
> > > on the same thread.
> > >
> > > ./alex
> > > --
> > > .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> > >
> > > > On 10/16/06, Tobias Bocanegra <tobias.bocanegra@day.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > if every thread uses it's own jcr session, yes.
> > > > > regards, toby
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/16/06, Ted Roeloffzen <ted.roeloffzen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I would really like to know if JackRabbit is threadsafe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Greets,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ted
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -----------------------------------------<
> tobias.bocanegra@day.com>---
> > > > > Tobias Bocanegra, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001
> > > Basel
> > > > > T +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97
> > > > > -----------------------------------------------<
> http://www.day.com>---
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

------=_Part_74358_9980963.1160995586436--