From users-return-1161-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Thu Oct 26 04:46:45 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 91968 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2006 06:59:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2006 06:59:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 42707 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2006 19:49:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 42699 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2006 19:49:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 42690 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2006 19:49:52 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:49:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.228] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:49:40 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t13so219803wxc for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:49:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HXdtTF42spMX4GltCEl1uHi7APslA6LLZqr8V4vSeVrYUykp2b4SO6Lo3eyzZgEogPdsZYvmSPG6osYwFGQ9YjWOi6atPCF7MaMgVb0KuODhotYikh+HnBmBStAD7/VL6ec9Phiz+HvBaVh0tJMizZDp9tS4lEcnExI0WT++EXQ= Received: by 10.78.149.13 with SMTP id w13mr1002232hud; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.81.11 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:49:19 +0300 From: "Alexandru Popescu" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: PersistenceManagers Benchmark In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <453F9654.5040402@gmail.com> <337642BF269E9B4688AD6E36BDF7002808BF5C16@KYLE.office.techtarget.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/25/06, Nicolas wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > Excellent ideas. > > I could use the JCR test suite and add some stress testing (ie 10 000 nodes, > importing XML). This way I could also compare different JCR implementation > according to different needs + JR different PM (I am currently more > interested in the Persistence Manager but this test suite can be easily > exteneded later). > > What kind of stress test should be needed? > If you are gonna use TestNG then concurrency stress testing can be a breath ;-). For example: making the following simple test a concurrency one: @Test public void nodeCreation() { // create 1000 nodes } @Test(invocationCount=10, threadPoolSize=10) public void nodeCreation() { // create 1000 nodes } I think I already have something for simple queries. If you have a good start, maybe we can create a Google Code hosted project to maintain/share these. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. > Should I put this result on the wiki or on a different web site? Same > question for the source code of the test? > > Nicolas > > On 10/25/06, Ottinger, Joseph wrote: > > > > Well, what we should do is determine what operations should be tested - > > then we can create a benchmark fairly easily. Storing a node is easy > > enough; querying the node is easy enough; storing properties, too. > > > > Any other suggestions for common operations? > > > > And is anyone else considering commons-jcr for creating common > > operations for JCR? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alexandru Popescu [mailto:the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 12:53 PM > > To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org > > Subject: Re: PersistenceManagers Benchmark > > > > #: Nicolas changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date: > > 10/25/2006 4:07 PM) :# > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am wondering if someone benchmarked each Persistence Manager with > > > Jackrabbit? > > > > > > I would like to understand better which PM is the best for which use. > > > For instance I would have thought file based PM have an overall better > > > > > performance than RDBMS ones. But it seems I am wrong. Am I the only > > > one curious about this? > > > > > > If nobody did it, I can write one and put it back to the wiki if > > > anyone's interested. > > > > > > BR, > > > Nico > > > my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !! > > > > > > > Hi Nico! > > > > I would be very interested in seeing some results for this. > > Unfortunately I don't have any time now to invest into this (nor a clear > > idea how to do it). It would be great if you can create something, > > because afterwards I am quite sure people will start contributing to it. > > > > ./alex > > -- > > .w( the_mindstorm )p. > > > > > > -- > a+ > Nico > my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !! > >