jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nicolas " <nto...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: PersistenceManagers Benchmark
Date Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:57:25 GMT
Hi Marcin,

I think they were discussing about the importXML method (available in
Workspace and Session classes). If my understanding of Jackrabbit is
correct, those methods allow specifically to import some XML in a workspace;

Nico

On 10/27/06, Marcin Nowak <marcin.j.nowak@comarch.com> wrote:
>
> As far as I know atomic parsing of nodes from XML is not available a this
> moment in JackRabit, am I right?
>
> BR,
> Marcin Nowak
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 1:41 PM
> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: PersistenceManagers Benchmark
>
> On 10/27/06, Marcin Nowak <marcin.j.nowak@comarch.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Regarding stress tests, I need to know where are the limitations of
> > importing XML's and where is a huge memory usage coming from.
>
> transactional importing of xml data is always going to be memory intensive
>
> the memory used in binding could be reduced by (say) custom SAX
> handling or pull parsing the input stream so long as each node were
> saved atomically
>
> - robert
>
>
> --
> Empowering business
> http://webinars.comarch.com
>



-- 
a+
Nico
my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !!

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message