Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 44062 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2006 10:02:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2006 10:02:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 80295 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2006 10:02:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 80278 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2006 10:02:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 80269 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2006 10:02:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 03:02:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of david.nuescheler@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.239 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.239] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.239) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 03:02:14 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t13so2329750wxc for ; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 03:01:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aDs9hq2+N1OrXNn/eGh1o7CYWk7676foXJFWas31JRCt3bY0qPFRyz7TbwQFbYcl/m36Z4XmeB1FpxgH7WCeZ0n7mtL3y4Lr7U+btp8opgNN6Nr17tHpn8Y5lUkru3aX0wPaenBX1vZOi4eEw1kOrUI+jyX7v/9P7nrKoM6lHzw= Received: by 10.90.54.20 with SMTP id c20mr1255354aga; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 03:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.67.10 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 03:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:01:53 +0200 From: "David Nuescheler" Reply-To: david.nuescheler@day.com To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Newbie seeking a leg up In-Reply-To: <63c452f80609041154y7b1dba8bn4618023fde26df8d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <63c452f80609031708u2bb38820m834ae72314f1c829@mail.gmail.com> <63c452f80609041154y7b1dba8bn4618023fde26df8d@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Sean, > Will do. We're hoping to run some basic tests in a couple of days. Looking forward to that. > Yep. We were part of the way towards implementing our own content > repository when we found JSR-170. Our main user requirement is a > snappy user experience, which equates to rapid query results. The "Content Model" can certainly affect your performance more than anything else. In my experience using hierarchies in a smart way can help avoiding a lot of queries. I can certainly see a difference between a traditional RDB data model and a good "Content Model", so if you don't mind sharing your content model we may be able to propose optimizations, based on the Jackrabbit internals and your application needs. > Hopefully JackRabbit will fit the bill, like most Jakarta > projects do ;-). As mentioned above, sometimes the "Content Model" makes all the difference. regards, david