Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 3810 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2006 13:17:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2006 13:17:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 41235 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2006 13:17:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 41228 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2006 13:17:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 41196 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2006 13:17:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:17:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ntoper@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.225] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:17:13 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t12so196367wxc for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:16:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=VXNFPqpNzLN5N0GTPgEn7anr/C6al+TQQRCxLH3v6LAJ4hG+vP962SKY01GKDEvTdQJnuCSLD2cfyGm+teI1sQYqRnuf4hVmGK+U0lBSoLy6DvPpOE0zo7SzoM4o1PrDalnoeC8svqeATdsulVDnvLEh/HlkLVuiWqhLdltCk4Y= Received: by 10.70.77.2 with SMTP id z2mr655332wxa; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.13.15 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:16:52 +0200 From: "Nicolas " To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: question about version removing In-Reply-To: <200608301610.25045.pospeshniy@softline.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_30421_26286645.1156943812291" References: <200608301610.25045.pospeshniy@softline.kiev.ua> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_30421_26286645.1156943812291 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Maybe we should add to the next version of Jackrabbit a definitive remove? In the meantime, if all remove are definitive, you can update the relevant classes. BR Nico my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !! On 8/30/06, Pospishniy Alexander wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 August 2006 16:02, Paranoid wrote: > > yes, i know that idea. but in our application - it is not restoring, it > is > > restoring of node state for some date. but we just need full remove. to > > make it null and then to remove. it is for security reasons. > > In other words we need to find a way to set all Version-bound field and > properties to NULL values before we remove it from workspace. The problem > is > that 1) we can't update versions because they are protected > read-only items > ------=_Part_30421_26286645.1156943812291--