Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 79621 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2006 07:09:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2006 07:09:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 54940 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2006 07:09:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 54771 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2006 07:09:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 54762 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2006 07:09:02 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:09:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of marcel.reutegger@gmx.net designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.165.64.20] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:09:02 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2006 07:08:40 -0000 Received: from bsl-rtr.day.com (EHLO [10.0.0.73]) [212.249.34.130] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 14 Aug 2006 09:08:40 +0200 X-Authenticated: #894343 Message-ID: <44E02174.9090300@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:08:36 +0200 From: Marcel Reutegger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: What is the better approach for publishing contents? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Dan, dan wrote: > Another question is, if I use RDBMS (db2, e.g.) for PersistenceManager and > FileSystemManager, would the Lucene indexes (workspace and versionstorage) > be located on the file system? Or within the database? the index will be located on the file system. in an earlier version of jackrabbit the implementation was using the FileSystem abstraction which would have made it possible to store the index in a data base. but it turned out that missing support for random access on the index files kills query performance. regards marcel