Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of
 the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.169 as permitted
 sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=i04swMWPBwHptZJsbiKNQyWtgspp9i2wDf4wrMdRlFBKcLOVB0unj6IVjFkhuohKLdPz9ZLMwQ6n/cW0lePqU8/IP9pgKB1f/oLoJT07shhiWoLGOVXUzjjAKWXC7Bp3WHuzYNZXn2nxOC+vM7MWslckEd1zPRqXSGJ208nm0sU=
Message-ID: <c6f400460606021845x1b953eaelb4de017cbc273f4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 04:45:30 +0300
From: "Alexandru Popescu" <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with indexes
In-Reply-To: <c6f400460606021804p5462a69el3f92bd980057e06@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <447AECF5.8020600@lightcomp.com> <447BF040.4080201@gmx.net>
	 <447C6918.4040608@lightcomp.com> <447DC2F8.30602@lightcomp.com>
	 <c6f400460606021804p5462a69el3f92bd980057e06@mail.gmail.com>

I have checked the jars at the last zip you provided, but the
jackrabbit-core seems to not include the patch for JCR-448 (which is
supposed to fix the problem).

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.


On 6/3/06, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com> wrote:
> Petr is the initial problem still valid if you use the patched
> (JCR-448) 1.0.1 release?
>
> ./alex
> --
> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
>
>
> On 5/31/06, Petr Pytelka <Petr.Pytelka@lightcomp.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've created simplified, faster and less resource consuming example of
> > problem.
> >
> > Only source code:
> > http://217.11.254.42/download/Test3.java (7kb)
> >
> > Package with all libraries:
> > http://217.11.254.42/download/index-problem.zip (5MB)
> >
> > Please could you anybody confirm if it is problem in Jackrabbit or in my
> > usage of JackRabbit ?
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> > Petr
> >
> >
> > Petr Pytelka wrote:
> > > Hi Marcel,
> > > I've tried to find out more about my issue but didn't succeed.
> > >
> > > There is small application which demonstrate the problem:
> > > http://217.11.254.42/download/index-problem.zip
> > >
> > > Steps to reproduce:
> > >
> > > Prerequisites:
> > > 1. This test is resource consuming - need computer with at least 512 MB,
> > > better 1 GB
> > > 2. Package contain all needed libs and also source code (10kb) - I was
> > > not able to create smaller example - sorry for that.
> > >
> > > Test can be run using script "run-test" or "run-test.bat" - at the
> > > beginning of each file is path to the Java.
> > >
> > > Whole test is trying to create 10000 nodes
> > >  - Phase 1: Create 20 nodes
> > >  - Phase 2: Query for last created 20 nodes
> > >
> > > Problem is that on faster machines this test fail around 3000-5000th
> > > document - it is not possible to locate file. Query in repository is
> > > based on the attribute values.
> > >
> > > Maybe that the problem is in my code.. I'll really appreciate if you can
> > > look on it...
> > >
> > > Thanks, Petr
> > >
> > >
> > > Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> > >> Hi Petr,
> > >>
> > >> can you please provide the source code to your test case that allows
> > >> us to reproduce the behaviour? Thanks
> > >>
> > >> regards
> > >>  marcel
> > >>
> > >> Petr Pytelka wrote:
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm testing performance of Jackrabbit and found one issue.
> > >>>
> > >>> Test case:
> > >>> 1. Insert N items
> > >>> 2. Search each of inserted items (using Query)
> > >>> 3. Drop inserted item
> > >>>
> > >>> When N is lower then aprox.1000 items every thinks works fine. But when
> > >>> N is higher then aprox. 1000 items Jackrabbit (Lucene) some how "lost"
> > >>> indexes and I'm not able to find required item (usualy I'm able to find
> > >>> first 300 items).
> > >>> If I delete index directory and re-run search, Jackrabbit build new
> > >>> indexes during startup and I'm able to find all items.
> > >>>
> > >>> Lucene: version 1.4.3
> > >>> DB-backend: Derby
> > >>>
> > >>> Any idea where can be problem ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks a lot, Petr Pytelka
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
>