jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Petr Pytelka <Petr.Pyte...@lightcomp.com>
Subject Re: Problem with indexes
Date Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:31:22 GMT
Hi,
test passed when I applied JCR-448 and JCR-450 on 1.0.1, using SUN JVM 
1.5.0_07.

Thanks, Petr

Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> A quick update (probably I will update it once more later).
> 
> I have run Test3 with JDK1.5.0_06 and JRockit1.5.0_06 and with the
> following configs:
> 
> 1/ jackrabbit-1.0: consistently fails between 700 - 1500 documents
> 2/ jackrabbit-1.0.1 (with patch JCR-448 included)
>    2.1/ with JDK1.5.0_06: results in a JVM crash at about 13000-15000 
> documents
>    2.2/ with JRockit1.5.0_06: the only one that finished the test
> 
> Unfortunately, I have run these test last night at about 5am, so I
> will completely redo it today and update this thread. My plan is to
> run the Test3 against jackrabbit-1.0, jackrabbit-1.0.1 and
> jackrabbit-1.0.1a (containing the patches for JCR-448 and JCR-450)
> with SUN JDK. If this will consistently fail (as above), than rerun
> all tests with JRockit 1.5.0_06.
> 
> hth,
> 
> ./alex
> -- 
> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> 
> 
> On 6/3/06, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have checked the jars at the last zip you provided, but the
>> jackrabbit-core seems to not include the patch for JCR-448 (which is
>> supposed to fix the problem).
>>
>> ./alex
>> -- 
>> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
>>
>>
>> On 6/3/06, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Petr is the initial problem still valid if you use the patched
>> > (JCR-448) 1.0.1 release?
>> >
>> > ./alex
>> > --
>> > .w( the_mindstorm )p.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 5/31/06, Petr Pytelka <Petr.Pytelka@lightcomp.com> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I've created simplified, faster and less resource consuming 
>> example of
>> > > problem.
>> > >
>> > > Only source code:
>> > > http://217.11.254.42/download/Test3.java (7kb)
>> > >
>> > > Package with all libraries:
>> > > http://217.11.254.42/download/index-problem.zip (5MB)
>> > >
>> > > Please could you anybody confirm if it is problem in Jackrabbit or 
>> in my
>> > > usage of JackRabbit ?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks a lot.
>> > >
>> > > Petr
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Petr Pytelka wrote:
>> > > > Hi Marcel,
>> > > > I've tried to find out more about my issue but didn't succeed.
>> > > >
>> > > > There is small application which demonstrate the problem:
>> > > > http://217.11.254.42/download/index-problem.zip
>> > > >
>> > > > Steps to reproduce:
>> > > >
>> > > > Prerequisites:
>> > > > 1. This test is resource consuming - need computer with at least 
>> 512 MB,
>> > > > better 1 GB
>> > > > 2. Package contain all needed libs and also source code (10kb) - 
>> I was
>> > > > not able to create smaller example - sorry for that.
>> > > >
>> > > > Test can be run using script "run-test" or "run-test.bat" - at the
>> > > > beginning of each file is path to the Java.
>> > > >
>> > > > Whole test is trying to create 10000 nodes
>> > > >  - Phase 1: Create 20 nodes
>> > > >  - Phase 2: Query for last created 20 nodes
>> > > >
>> > > > Problem is that on faster machines this test fail around 
>> 3000-5000th
>> > > > document - it is not possible to locate file. Query in 
>> repository is
>> > > > based on the attribute values.
>> > > >
>> > > > Maybe that the problem is in my code.. I'll really appreciate if 
>> you can
>> > > > look on it...
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks, Petr
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Marcel Reutegger wrote:
>> > > >> Hi Petr,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> can you please provide the source code to your test case that

>> allows
>> > > >> us to reproduce the behaviour? Thanks
>> > > >>
>> > > >> regards
>> > > >>  marcel
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Petr Pytelka wrote:
>> > > >>> Hi all,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I'm testing performance of Jackrabbit and found one issue.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Test case:
>> > > >>> 1. Insert N items
>> > > >>> 2. Search each of inserted items (using Query)
>> > > >>> 3. Drop inserted item
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> When N is lower then aprox.1000 items every thinks works fine.

>> But when
>> > > >>> N is higher then aprox. 1000 items Jackrabbit (Lucene) some

>> how "lost"
>> > > >>> indexes and I'm not able to find required item (usualy I'm

>> able to find
>> > > >>> first 300 items).
>> > > >>> If I delete index directory and re-run search, Jackrabbit

>> build new
>> > > >>> indexes during startup and I'm able to find all items.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Lucene: version 1.4.3
>> > > >>> DB-backend: Derby
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Any idea where can be problem ?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Thanks a lot, Petr Pytelka
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > >
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message