From users-return-124-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Mon May 08 13:41:33 2006
Return-Path: <users-return-124-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96140 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 13:41:31 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 May 2006 13:41:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 31494 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2006 13:41:30 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 31471 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2006 13:41:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.jackrabbit.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 31462 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2006 13:41:30 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:41:30 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of michael.baranov@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.186 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.182.186] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.186)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:41:29 -0700
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m18so705523nfc
        for <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=MpJinVOnHHXrA4MlvH+4Ss/CNaO2FNR2MoV4p+BJVxxvlBTOGvXzf4tpNnUU5gVEsPhxdYY/tjsCQNDDKAARwO8fOf32mv9zkl6TZRQ8TEXliFQ63T6RfYsCLB3SzlYDyhicGA6hx+z3fl241zE4ZVuso3mii+VdeImPz5Jygrk=
Received: by 10.48.157.11 with SMTP id f11mr1171970nfe;
        Mon, 08 May 2006 06:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?82.209.228.224? ( [82.209.228.224])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q27sm1970161nfc.2006.05.08.06.41.02;
        Mon, 08 May 2006 06:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <445F4A6F.3030909@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:41:03 +0300
From: Michael Baranov <michael.baranov@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Several newbie questions:
References: <445B868E.2020803@gmail.com> <90a8d1c00605080127p53326dd7h2123059aba34ea15@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <90a8d1c00605080127p53326dd7h2123059aba34ea15@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Thanks for the reply!
>
> see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/5736/
>
So I see that there is no way to store Lucene index in the DB, right?

Well, I'm actually worried by the fact that the repository may get 
corrupted if the JVM process is shut down abruptly.
How are transactions supposed to work for Jackrabbit? Let's assume we 
can rely on jdbc transactions for our embedded Derby, but what for the 
Lucene index files? Can Lucene recover from failures (repair the index)?

Thanks,
    Michael.