From oak-issues-return-65288-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@jackrabbit.apache.org Thu Oct 4 10:52:04 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 709F2180658 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:52:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 24685 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2018 08:52:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-issues-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 24674 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2018 08:52:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 08:52:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 25D4AC798F for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.301 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.301 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3CZUiW6iGmZu for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7B3355F3E2 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C5021E111B for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 24D5A246DF for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:52:00 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Tomek_R=C4=99kawek_=28JIRA=29?= To: oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (OAK-7805) getBinaryReferences() may return null when using the split persistence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Tomek R=C4=99kawek created OAK-7805: ---------------------------------- Summary: getBinaryReferences() may return null when using the = split persistence Key: OAK-7805 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7805 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Tomek R=C4=99kawek Fix For: 1.10 When the new SplitPersistence is used for the SegmentMK, the getBinaryRefer= ences() method may sometimes break the contract and return null. It will ha= ppen for the reader referencing an archive which hasn't been closed yet by = another Oak instance (and therefore missing the .brf entry). Since the .brf file is unavailable in this case, we should at least return = a valid, empty binary references structure. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)