jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matt Ryan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-7570) [DirectBinaryAccess][DISCUSS] Client access via DataStoreBlobStore directly
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2018 03:14:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16519938#comment-16519938
] 

Matt Ryan commented on OAK-7570:
--------------------------------

>From an [email on oak-dev|https://markmail.org/message/g6cymwquxuy5h2tj] from [~mreutegg]:
{quote}If the BlobStore implements HttpBlobProvider register it with 
that interface as well and use it to construct the repository. Something 
like: 

BlobStore bs = ... 
NodeStore ns = ... 
Jcr jcr = new Jcr(ns) 
if (bs instanceof HttpBlobProvider) 
jcr.with((HttpBlobProvider) bs) 
Repository r = jcr.createRepository() 

By default, the Jcr factory would have a HttpBlobProvider implementation 
that doesn't support the feature, which also relieves the repository 
implementation from checking the type or for null on every call to the 
new feature (as is the case in SessionImpl, MutableRoot, 
DocumentNodeStore, SegmentNodeStore)
{quote}
 

> [DirectBinaryAccess][DISCUSS] Client access via DataStoreBlobStore directly
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-7570
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7570
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Technical task
>          Components: blob-plugins
>            Reporter: Matt Ryan
>            Assignee: Matt Ryan
>            Priority: Major
>
> Open discussion related to OAK-7569:
> The [original pull request|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/88] proposes
changes to oak-api, oak-segment-tar, oak-store-document, oak-core, and oak-jcr as well as
oak-blob-plugins, oak-blob-cloud, and oak-blob-azure.  Would it be possible / better to keep
the changes local to the oak-blob-* bundles and avoid making changes throughout the stack?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message