jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davide Giannella <dav...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0
Date Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:08:27 GMT
On 06/12/2017 09:39, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I vote for 1.8. I don't see any big changes that would justify version 2.0. The modularization
(moving code around) is an ongoing process, I don't think this is "fixed", and shouldn't have
a big impact on users.

+1


On 06/12/2017 09:41, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> Upgrading lucene to version 6 would probably warrant using 2.0, but that's
> not ready yet for 1.8?

Yes that would IMO justify a major version change as it will probably
impact considerably an upgrade/update process.

D.

Mime
View raw message