Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF6EE10CE2 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 23:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76586 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2014 23:36:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 76544 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2014 23:36:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 76529 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2014 23:36:33 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 23:36:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ig0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username tripod, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 23:36:32 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ur14so6515553igb.2 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:36:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vh69zmvPkAopLXOaJDpV2NFCKOGd9UA+q5fPfwLYbOI=; b=l/c1A1PYl6G6a5mvfg2ypR4shyZ0N8iUGBHY8CHNVoCwCwOh0wo3A93yiXot4YqcPj g0stRVfAEVZG1VBVU9Zb2Wd4sOWHPt0ruxxkEderlpWVKhjJdgz3LIhtfofPLWTT86ge 1Jmb4HEZhBsTs1egqtm5uK+CNrVwNENA8dr6vMJFjreSh/msXkIwXNUxjBAjQGIW6iT6 E25eueL+T+ufzzzQhpwAhSB4vZJq0bnjTLdWSli/sL/Uc2+Wkdb25oQuRcckwpfD3FhZ K1bcBS/+B+Z6zo/IfXkLzwvVqeUNPzUMRrD8CE15bEPXWaRdUut/9rC6c8i9OhLSZ5is 70fw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7rtKFC/4LI9VuP27EZTDjic4XFLynXdEMXkaE3QuR4rwOHQvOaj9+v3Fld7D3M4IK5lSF MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.75.2 with SMTP id yy2mr2073445icb.54.1393976191749; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:36:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.207.136 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:36:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:36:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: why do we index 'rep%3AGrantACE' ? From: Tobias Bocanegra To: "oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I played around with concurrent ACL updates with (Oak-Mongo) and I saw commit errors like: aused by: org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.api.MicroKernelException: The node 6:/oak:index/nodetype/:index/rep%3AGrantACE/test68fa4877/node75 was already added in revision which brings the question, why we index those node types in the first place? I doubt that anyone will search for internal node types. shouldn't we exclude all rep:* nodetypes? regards, toby