Return-Path: 
 <oak-dev-return-5516-apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B62AE10ABE
	for <apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:13:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 3602 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2013 17:13:52 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3457 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2013 17:13:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:oak-dev-unsubscribe@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Id: <oak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org>
Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3435 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2013 17:13:47 -0000
Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:13:47 +0000
Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ie0-f179.google.com) (127.0.0.1)
  (smtp-auth username tripod, mechanism plain)
  by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP;
 Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:13:46 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x13so1065545ief.38
        for <oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>;
 Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:13:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=PboP9pK9Qkp6iDVNCuGq2RtmWovhVrtrWTlCjiEbI3Y=;
        b=QnLqzgdKT/E+Av1AA4vMeWcOp/IL9mjOStaj5K2Z3qA3D2Ye5xuWMJKPbcgc3VxMoQ
         Yt6iOZ0yuX0at3C2ANiUfwCymkhmxvWkCktobwpe3qCORoIDkJBGrN2AzXjfJnLG0HTH
         tkh3lFqUfhahO+UvMZOLxaxPTqIB3ntyfpsrBJBpXHUNaWRAZK38W+YlEbYCEuiWfMG+
         1/BiT45U9au3iwXx1yd045zAmtEdmIL3w6ZruKwmqLFCu1szao1GXRbDEH8OJ52jQWRU
         RrhzhpUexRqqzFL+uqvqdm9MJXynF68DVj13FCwxPyNbO1tTybBK5F8rzdIBEBmVzMDS
         PpkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQlE9NmXNEeFVEIdrW11tN1KWLbJWYxlN7sGNa3kpZQVqmw6aI84P9uNlBZyE9C3icnU5Ki+
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.43.82.69 with SMTP id ab5mr1423263icc.95.1386868426271; Thu,
 12 Dec 2013 09:13:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.239.208 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:13:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:13:46 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAB+dfikGqi-cxYOnTSHOWx5qkGhA5r91LqA7jukgbPn1DPh-+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: ORDER BY
From: Tobias Bocanegra <tripod@apache.org>
To: "oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" <oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

what would be needed to implement a subset of OAK-1263, so that it
supports OrderBy queries for well defined property types?

Thomas suggested that we mandate that all index keys are mandated,
also for the NodeStore.
WDYT?

regards, toby