Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 670A8105B4 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24359 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2013 20:42:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 24324 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2013 20:42:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 24314 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2013 20:42:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:42:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aklimets@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.35] (HELO exprod6og115.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:42:01 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob115.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUoFBBesTx/iZ+agscdsnBtLIRDSQ5zdu@postini.com; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:41:41 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id rABKbut2007101 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:37:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id rABKfa6B007268 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:41:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.30) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.327.1; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:41:36 -0800 Received: from eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.32]) by eurhub01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.30]) with mapi; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:41:04 +0000 From: Alexander Klimetschek To: "oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:41:01 +0000 Subject: Re: Observation Thread-Topic: Observation Thread-Index: Ac7fHlY1RRwF2pMWSRy9xXmxv2tZsA== Message-ID: <3155B380-E051-4096-9ABC-C3B9EE680E23@adobe.com> References: <33997BDF-F06A-4120-BE72-E41481B5C7EF@adobe.com> <527CBCC7.70506@apache.org> <527CCECC.5030004@apache.org> <60ACD7D5-B80C-4AE4-9EAC-A49130CC2DD2@adobe.com> <5280BB37.6010401@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11.11.2013, at 10:29, Jukka Zitting wrote: > So instead of the spec, I think we should look at existing client code > to determine what kind of expectations they have. A quick search across our large application code base (Apache Sling & Adobe= CQ) doesn't yield a single EventJournal usage. Cheers, Alex=