Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E40010B76 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50466 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2013 08:02:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 49899 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2013 08:02:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 49834 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2013 08:02:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:02:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fmeschbe@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.189] (HELO exprod6og105.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:02:11 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUcAT7SLxkTHtLPrdbGQaPaZW/k18+a+l@postini.com; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:01:50 PDT Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (ms-exchange.macromedia.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r5I81mAI023407 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r5I81k6C023998 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.30) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:01:46 -0700 Received: from eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.32]) by eurhub01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.30]) with mapi; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:01:44 +0100 From: Felix Meschberger To: "oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:01:41 +0100 Subject: Re: Move MongoMK to Oak Core Thread-Topic: Move MongoMK to Oak Core Thread-Index: Ac5r+hL821OoH3aoQUCa/PzRvbJ85g== Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi I have the impression, that this imght solve your short-term issue but in t= he long term you actually dilute modularity in that you integrte a single, = special MK implementation into Oak Core. I may be way off the current implementation, but from a modularization POV = this sounds perfectly wrong. Regards Felix Am 18.06.2013 um 07:31 schrieb Chetan Mehrotra: > I wanted to make use of the new Whiteboard support [1] for publishing > Cache related MBeans and for Scheduler Service. I see two options >=20 > 1. Move the Whiteboard support to oak Commons > 2. Move MongoMk to Oak Core >=20 > Similar requirement was felt for use of StringCache in MongoMK [2]. > There also it was suggested to move Mongo MK to Oak Core. So should we > move the codebase to Oak Core and change the package from > o.a.j.mongomk to o.a.j.oak.plugins.mongomk >=20 > Chetan Mehrotra >=20 > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-867 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-861