Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E3EAF35F for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32925 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2013 08:19:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 32887 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2013 08:19:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 32866 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2013 08:19:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:19:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.49] (HELO mail-oa0-f49.google.com) (209.85.219.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:18:58 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j1so3145554oag.8 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 01:18:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=jDkbc9B+HgjdHH1cC9s6EzgPATpo0VZJOfZAFemlXLU=; b=ea4lAjoCDW64nYYpTmFuiJ4IEL9K3Uwy55Y/HifNjTd+v340E6XU4hXaYweo0lq57g aZPBQFkIgI2fIJqeUcdYSI9TLWd5jrJ85MkEH+fNHj+h/yQnqqVEQn1sKaokKH0yq7y3 qUqxGh1xCysTfR7W/Gl3a3gRJMQ62NwHHTbc8vzT9sKbtzMd5bGADu/JflKxyqz2+oYR zMMYOGjFYQ6oQLWGPnDRZtadCsTyMmIFa79J9L8FpgSwQqVfh7dNUx+uabMC9+TyrkQR IFNTDIIchXinJqHEUgSb0JAxYNauudQShuGVqHjo9UG36v/NRZEqBxH7+Q5e0FolakoR 3+dA== X-Received: by 10.182.153.36 with SMTP id vd4mr9162349obb.72.1366618717649; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 01:18:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.61.44 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 01:18:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5174F02D.7080601@adobe.com> References: <5174F02D.7080601@adobe.com> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:18:17 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can the children of a non-visible node be listed? To: Oak devs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Angela Schreiber wrote: > i would expect the same... in particular since > >> session.getNode("/foo").getNodes(); // contains "bar" >> session.getNode("/foo").getProperties(); // contains "baz" > > session.getNode("/foo") should never work if you are not > allowed to retrieve that node and thus you don't have the > means to retrieve the child collection from that node. Good, thanks for the confirmation! BR, Jukka Zitting