Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F14E1043B for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58499 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2013 11:15:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 58441 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2013 11:15:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 58415 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2013 11:14:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:14:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anchela@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.29] (HELO exprod6og112.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:14:52 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob112.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUXUbmAQYzbA3Z8jzCFx8NBiGHeTi8bo+@postini.com; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:14:32 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r3MBBI1v019405 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id r3MBEPGW019790 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.30) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 04:14:25 -0700 Received: from angela.corp.adobe.com (10.132.1.90) by eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.298.1; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:14:24 +0100 Message-ID: <51751B90.8020600@adobe.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:14:24 +0200 From: Angela Schreiber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Accessibility of NodeTypes, Privileges and Namespaces References: <5174F33E.7010902@adobe.com> <51750862.50602@adobe.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi jukka > How about my suggestion of including a default ACL on /jcr:system that > grants read permission to that subtree to everyone, regardless of what > access controls are defined on the root node? that's basically my proposal a) but i am not totally sure if that's the best solution... in particular it will not work if someone would deny read-access to a 'user' on the root node... in addition i am not sure, if we really want to have full/regular ac-evaluation for those trees... anyway... i will try it and attach patches to the issue. regards angela