jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lukas Eder <mar09...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Some more benchmarks
Date Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:17:51 GMT
Hello,

I'm interested in estimating performance (and load) impacts of ACL
checking on read access. I'm specifically interested in a comparison where
paths like /a, /a/b, /a/b/c, /a/.../y/z are accessed, and ACL has to be
evaluated "upwards" on the path. Since such a test is more high-level and
may suffer from many side-effects, it's probably more of a load test than
a performance test.

Are there any test results available with respect to ACL, comparing
Jackrabbit with Oak?
Are there any load test results available comparing Jackrabbit with Oak?
Can you point me to the code of these benchmarks?

Cheers
Lukas

On 4/26/13 1:12 PM, "Jukka Zitting" <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Here's a few more simple benchmark results to show where we are:
>
>Updated numbers with latest Oak:
>
>    # ReadPropertyTest               min     10%     50%     90%     max
>     N
>    Jackrabbit                        34      35      37      60     110
>  1333
>    Oak-Default                        8       9       9      20      76
>  4972
>    Oak-Mongo                         10      10      11      34      38
>  4501
>    Oak-Segment                       13      13      14      37      44
>  3482
>    # SmallFileReadTest              min     10%     50%     90%     max
>     N
>    Jackrabbit                        50      52      76     117     622
>   764
>    Oak-Default                       51      53      77     390     496
>   483
>    Oak-Mongo                        159     160     184     517     657
>   259
>    Oak-Segment                       15      16      17      40      86
>  2813
>    # SmallFileWriteTest             min     10%     50%     90%     max
>     N
>    Jackrabbit                       181     200     250     469    1088
>   105
>    Oak-Default                      169     180     232     429     923
>   107
>    Oak-Mongo                        698     727     886    1051    1066
>    26
>    Oak-Segment                      221     247     262     337     651
>    77
>
>Overall that's pretty nice progress. Apart from a few exceptions,
>we're now better (sometimes significantly so) or on par with
>Jackrabbit 2.x in these benchmarks.
>
>BR,
>
>Jukka Zitting


Mime
View raw message