jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: NodeStore or MicroKernel.
Date Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:22:48 GMT
Hi,

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Ian Boston <ieb@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> Should I depend on a reference of a MicroKernel or a NodeStore when
> constructing the Oak class (new
> Oak(?).when(....).createContentRepositroy()) ?

It's better if you use the Oak(NodeStore) signature as that'll work
also with the SegmentMK backend that implements just the NodeStore
interface instead of MicroKernel. The Oak(MicroKernel) signature just
wraps the given MicroKernel instance to a KernelNodeStore.

> I see there are a number of providers in the oak-core bundle. Should I
> use these to build the Oak class or is it Ok to build it from internal
> instances ?

You mean the OSGi services that oak-core provides?

It's still a bit of an open question whether the core repository
should be wired up entirely through OSGi or have some of the core
components (security, node type validation, etc.) injected directly
with Oak.with() as hardcoded parts. The latter approach (coupled with
hooks to bring in also more dynamic OSGi services) might be better as
it gives us more control over repository startup.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Mime
View raw message