Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15451E9D7 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36101 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2013 08:22:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 36060 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2013 08:22:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 36039 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2013 08:22:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:22:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.44] (HELO mail-oa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.219.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:22:46 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id h1so4638087oag.31 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:22:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=aR1qFZxO94A0eUcw1V64UYF7s0ieE/w9mvThjGjq9zY=; b=RhPI8ibMM83tZzf3+qBgzqZqxIC3xUo02Bhx7Q3/jFHVUr1gJYbTDGl8exf3TrjsN6 ELBsVsZjw/tMSIuiozdw5SiUh9mjT5Jy7rzk3aSQymoW4hdvVGSLvyxxA+pyY3qkLOi9 faVNHLLXCEgxPz86AI+jqZixoRn/FeN2uyM36SKjv0/AhcMNWDnY8jNZWt3Ku9yy4hO0 XZicIpQfSXVmjjz6jsbpwOF/Nbm05V7snN9Tdl2jkuERmCXp+nzI0Bvhcb7EUtYAA8wT pcSh3iXVS84ANLoxQMT2YatAoABfZNut5GTbjTmKSmQ/gwyFfnMEUp8TgL0tDWceSCcT r35Q== X-Received: by 10.182.98.109 with SMTP id eh13mr10715762obb.50.1361866945909; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:22:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.132.20 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:22:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <512C6ED6.9010107@adobe.com> References: <512C6ED6.9010107@adobe.com> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:22:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dropping ItemImpl.checkPropertected() To: Oak devs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Angela Schreiber wrote: > -1 from my side. i think it's important to distinguish protected > items that are meant to be filled in by the system or by dedicated API. Agreed, but do we need to make this distinction separately during each addNode() and setProperty() call, instead of just once during save()? BR, Jukka Zitting