jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Mueller <muel...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: MicroKernelIT#conflictingMove
Date Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:53:48 GMT

>>Instead of the MicroKernel trying to merge changes, I would prefer if the
>> MicroKernel would fail if a node was changed, moved or deleted after the
>> base revision of a commit. That way, the MicroKernel API would still
>> a base revision in the commit call (the base revision would arguably be
>> even more important), but the behaviour would slightly change.
>isn't this exactly what Michael described previously in this thread?

I'm not sure - do you refer to "MK.commit should fail on all but conflicts
which are trivially merged"?


View raw message