jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Boston <...@tfd.co.uk>
Subject Re: Concurrency Question
Date Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:47:58 GMT
On 31 January 2013 21:36, Thomas Mueller <mueller@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>>fuzzy distributed
>>time signal (as used in Google Spanner)
> That's quite interesting actually: Google Spanner relies on cluster nodes
> having very accurate clocks (atomic clocks / GPS): "TrueTime"

Only for the masters and then only to tie geographically distributed
servers to the same concept of TrueTime. In the same datacenter I
think the algorithm relies on determining jitter between nodes and
masters can agree amongst themselves what TrueTime is.

However for those that can't put GPS clocks into distributed
datacenters, and have control over the quality of the low level
hardware the fuzz on TrueTime is going to be too large to be of use.

I was thinking a highly accurate timestamp with knowledge of the
jitter might help in conflict resolution at merge time.... but maybe


> http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/09/google-spanner/all/
> http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/researc
> h.google.com/en//archive/spanner-osdi2012.pdf
> Regards,
> Thomas

View raw message