Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matamel@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.238 as permitted sender)
From: Mete Atamel <matamel@adobe.com>
To: "oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" <oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:41:51 -0800
Subject: Re: [Broken] apache/jackrabbit-oak#222 (trunk - 977cbcf)
Thread-Topic: [Broken] apache/jackrabbit-oak#222 (trunk - 977cbcf)
Thread-Index: Ac27bBdu6lPSgk2KQB21k3othGrSzA==
Message-ID: <CCBD9C46.1DFCE%matamel@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <CCBD91AF.1DFB8%matamel@adobe.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Looks like deploying a snapshot was not enough, the build is broken again.

-Mete

On 11/5/12 3:55 PM, "Mete Atamel" <matamel@adobe.com> wrote:

>Hi Alex, I opened the pull request [0] again. Let's see what happens.
>
>-Mete
>
>[0] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/6
>
>On 11/5/12 11:41 AM, "Alex Parvulescu" <alex.parvulescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Yes that is usually done by the CI system.
>>I'm guessing Travis CI does not cover that scenario the same way as
>>Jenkins
>>does.
>>
>>I deployed an oak 0.6 snapshot version, I'd be curious to see if the
>>build
>>passes after the maven repos get synced (and if deploying a snapshot is
>>in
>>fact enough).
>>So can you reopen the pull request later on?
>>
>>alex
>>
>>On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Mete Atamel <matamel@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > The build is green, I missed the notification that everything is good
>>> >though.
>>>
>>> Yes, because I deleted the pull request from my fork to
>>> apache/jackrabbit-oak. Who's supposed to send that "everything is good"
>>> notification? This is usually done automatically by the build system
>>>but I
>>> guess that's not the case in this project?
>>>
>>> -Mete
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/5/12 10:05 AM, "Alex Parvulescu" <alex.parvulescu@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>> >Never mind me :)
>>> >
>>> >The build is green, I missed the notification that everything is good
>>> >though.
>>> >
>>> >alex
>>> >
>>> >On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Parvulescu
>>> ><alex.parvulescu@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> following the link to the build output:
>>> >>
>>> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project oak-mk-perf: Could not
>>>resolve
>>> >> dependencies for project
>>> >> org.apache.jackrabbit:oak-mk-perf:jar:0.6-SNAPSHOT: Could not find
>>> >>artifact
>>> >> org.apache.jackrabbit:oak-mongomk:jar:0.6-SNAPSHOT in
>>> >> travis-ci-sonatype-snapshots
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm assuming that the oak-mongomk jar has never been deployed to the
>>> >> Manven repos.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> alex
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Mete Atamel <matamel@adobe.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> No idea why it says oak/trunk is broken when I'm updating my own
>>>fork
>>> >>>of
>>> >>> oak/trunk. Anyone?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -Mete
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 11/1/12 2:30 PM, "Travis-CI" <notifications@travis-ci.org>
>>>wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> >Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
>>> >>> >-------------------------------------
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >Build: #222
>>> >>> >Status: Broken
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >Duration: 5 minutes and 58 seconds
>>> >>> >Commit: 977cbcf (trunk)
>>> >>> >Author: Mete Atamel
>>> >>> >Message: Moved some of GetNodesCommandMongoTest to
>>>MongoMKGetNodesTest
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >View the changeset:
>>>https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/5
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >View the full build log and details:
>>> >>> >http://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds/3017640
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >--
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >You can configure recipients for build notifications in your
>>> >>>.travis.yml
>>> >>> >file. See http://bit.ly/lCybCJ
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >The delivery of this notification was kindly sponsored by
>>>Postmark.
>>> >>>Send
>>> >>> >transactional email confidently using http://postmarkapp.com
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>