Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matamel@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.234 as permitted sender)
From: Mete Atamel <matamel@adobe.com>
To: "oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" <oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 01:29:02 -0800
Subject: Re: [Broken] apache/jackrabbit-oak#222 (trunk - 977cbcf)
Thread-Topic: [Broken] apache/jackrabbit-oak#222 (trunk - 977cbcf)
Thread-Index: Ac27OAGb5NGWEHJVQFiC6hN5KcJjCA==
Message-ID: <CCBD445E.1DF26%matamel@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB-0WTApXvUe3wTjE9P0GT-GVtLuBieuiao2HeS6WoszRvjvWA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Hi,

> The build is green, I missed the notification that everything is good
>though.

Yes, because I deleted the pull request from my fork to
apache/jackrabbit-oak. Who's supposed to send that "everything is good"
notification? This is usually done automatically by the build system but I
guess that's not the case in this project?

-Mete


On 11/5/12 10:05 AM, "Alex Parvulescu" <alex.parvulescu@gmail.com> wrote:

>Never mind me :)
>
>The build is green, I missed the notification that everything is good
>though.
>
>alex
>
>On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Parvulescu
><alex.parvulescu@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> following the link to the build output:
>>
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project oak-mk-perf: Could not resolve
>> dependencies for project
>> org.apache.jackrabbit:oak-mk-perf:jar:0.6-SNAPSHOT: Could not find
>>artifact
>> org.apache.jackrabbit:oak-mongomk:jar:0.6-SNAPSHOT in
>> travis-ci-sonatype-snapshots
>>
>> I'm assuming that the oak-mongomk jar has never been deployed to the
>> Manven repos.
>>
>>
>> alex
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Mete Atamel <matamel@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No idea why it says oak/trunk is broken when I'm updating my own fork
>>>of
>>> oak/trunk. Anyone?
>>>
>>> -Mete
>>>
>>> On 11/1/12 2:30 PM, "Travis-CI" <notifications@travis-ci.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
>>> >-------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >Build: #222
>>> >Status: Broken
>>> >
>>> >Duration: 5 minutes and 58 seconds
>>> >Commit: 977cbcf (trunk)
>>> >Author: Mete Atamel
>>> >Message: Moved some of GetNodesCommandMongoTest to MongoMKGetNodesTest
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >View the changeset: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/5
>>> >
>>> >View the full build log and details:
>>> >http://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds/3017640
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >
>>> >You can configure recipients for build notifications in your
>>>.travis.yml
>>> >file. See http://bit.ly/lCybCJ
>>> >
>>> >The delivery of this notification was kindly sponsored by Postmark.
>>>Send
>>> >transactional email confidently using http://postmarkapp.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>