Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D1CF92F4 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51074 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2012 10:05:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 51021 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2012 10:05:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 50980 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2012 10:05:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:05:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.18.1.181] (HELO exprod6og101.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:05:32 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob101.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUJjg1sGkvD/S7ExAHUzyWXVRPUrLnxw5@postini.com; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:05:11 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qA6A59HP028344 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 02:05:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qA6A58Nc017995 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 02:05:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.30) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 02:05:08 -0800 Received: from susi.local (10.136.138.41) by eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:05:06 +0000 Message-ID: <5098E0D4.5020203@apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:05:08 +0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_D=FCrig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: [MongoMK] BlobStore garbage collection References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5.11.12 13:04, Thomas Mueller wrote: > If possible, I would try to avoid having to traverse over the whole > repository. Isn't node and revision store GC in the current MicrokernelImpl doing exactly that? AFAIR it implements a mark and sweep algorithm which periodically traverses the whole repository. Michael