jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

On 7.11.12 14:54, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this has been discussed before (but I'm not sure): there is a performance problem
in TreeImpl.isRemoved(). I think I found a temporary workaround:

See also the fixme tag in the code: FIXME rely on underlying mechanism 
to determine whether a node has been removed. (OAK-417)

I'd like to eventually improve this by pushing this functionality down 
to the NodeBuilder. See OAK-417.

Michael