Hi,
I didn't change it because I don't understand why it is currently
done that way. my first impression was also that one could use
the NodeStore and NodeStates to manipulate content.
anyone know why it's currently done on the MK directly?
Regards
Marcel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dürig [mailto:mduerig@apache.org]
> Sent: Montag, 1. Oktober 2012 18:23
> To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1392352 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk: oak-
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/ oak-
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/core/ oak-
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/osgi/ oak-
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackr...
>
>
>
> On 1.10.12 15:36, mreutegg@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: mreutegg
> > Date: Mon Oct 1 14:36:57 2012
> > New Revision: 1392352
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1392352&view=rev
> > Log:
> > OAK-41: Initial repository setup
> >
> [...]
> > +public class InitialContent extends DefaultMicroKernelTracker {
> > +
> > + @Override
> > + public void available(MicroKernel mk) {
> > + NodeStore nodeStore = new Oak(mk).createNodeStore();
> > + // FIXME: depends on CoreValue's name mangling
> > + NodeState root = nodeStore.getRoot();
> > + if (root.hasChildNode("jcr:system")) {
> > + mk.commit("/", "^\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:root\" ", null,
> null);
> > + } else {
> > + mk.commit("/", "^\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:root\"" +
> > + "+\"jcr:system\":{" +
> > + "\"jcr:primaryType\" :\"nam:rep:system\"," +
> > + "\":unique\"
> :{\"jcr:uuid\":{},\"rep:authorizableId\":{},\"rep:principalName\":{}}," +
> > + "\"jcr:versionStorage\"
> :{\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:versionStorage\"}," +
> > + "\"jcr:nodeTypes\"
> :{\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:nodeTypes\"}," +
> > + "\"jcr:activities\"
> :{\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:Activities\"}," +
> > + "\"rep:privileges\"
> :{\"jcr:primaryType\":\"nam:rep:Privileges\"}}", null, null);
> > + }
> > +
> > + BuiltInNodeTypes.register(new Oak(mk).createRoot());
> > + }
> > +}
>
> Shouldn't it be pretty easy to resolve this FIXME now? I.e. either use a
> Root instance or a NodeStore and NodeBuilders for adding this initial
> structure?
>
> Michael
|