jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: The destiny of Oak (Was: [RESULT] [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort)
Date Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:20:26 GMT
On 2012-10-01 15:57, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> 2012/10/1 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>:
>> I'm not sure that it's a good idea to call something "Jackrabbit" that is so
>> different in what it supports compared to "current" Jackrabbit.
> Just from the peanut gallery: we did the same years ago with Cocoon,
> the 2.0 version was 100% different than every previous version, even
> migration was not possible. And it worked out pretty well - in the
> beginning everyone referenced the new version as "Cocoon 2" (like JR
> 3) in contrast to just "Cocoon" for the old one. But over time this
> changed and wasn't a problem at all.
> Regards
> Carsten

Offlist: wenn das nächste CQ auf defaultmäßig auf Oak läuft bin ich 
überzeugt :-)

View raw message