Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F14FD87C for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92752 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2012 18:17:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 92669 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2012 18:17:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 92417 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2012 18:17:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:17:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.170] (HELO mail-vc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.220.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:17:00 +0000 Received: by vcbfk26 with SMTP id fk26so5934488vcb.1 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:16:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=nLvkcR7TCb8MNhAxgyXTbSNVkl+9QqZLBiUMV5S4stc=; b=0wLZCO7WwbVrJ5/kTlakadQL4lu7Ujr5AkNYjSg8Dkdao51jB4O/PrOCvvOg1hfW0H PMbnigl/NytR6vk2q/WvwYpomjG1IlkuvBtcNId/9BmnJmK84tRrjJRCyRnwVwAmC/Dl gasLGHMybzglbKC/Zr3ZjxdHkwcXGdxi9pRgXLlgptntppdDxnaHBDJ4yyA0lekMxI9R CgQXixIA5S76U9+8Z5OnRc1Bsjw/fEtxCOO+dC4JikPXO2d5KTlpmzWfhud5vNoTBya3 KHqE3kj3gVyXVcXqa+zwKpaKJFpVTL4vevAvYhbKqpc6ceT83+ALAC1zPymcI4dRWfQ7 BicA== Received: by 10.220.222.206 with SMTP id ih14mr1535775vcb.6.1348164998985; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:16:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.91.194 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:16:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jukka Zitting Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:16:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: On custom index configuration To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Your are right. To do this efficiently it would require an index on > [oak:indexed], which would effectively be the same as having the list of > indexes (and where they are configured) stored at a central place... Right. The differences to an explicit list are that a node type index can be used for a lot of other things too and that there's no need for extra code to maintain such a list. BR, Jukka Zitting