Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 838F9D1D9 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35240 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2012 13:15:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 35140 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2012 13:15:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 35128 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2012 13:15:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:15:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.170] (HELO mail-vc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.220.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:15:03 +0000 Received: by vcbfk26 with SMTP id fk26so5126694vcb.1 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:14:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=t0AWhnnkQvjNpyparJAc55E4CH9X3+cdgwEH3WXIhm4=; b=aCPCu+ZOme/YxVsTc1CF9GSq2T0tXqIE7tcgiwqdaoZ1vKL1PMmMfvyUf5d82L4Lgl Q6W0QDfA97G5eysfWCApFN6Xnt/VZBsFuCk+zROhm4xdjLneqbmxhwM25T3YEFDSHDmZ UPlPz4NIW+rql2/WyncUn9xBm7IZH36k4H1zjkEG70fk4AfsCmM99PDNMK4i6MY6gqDm ThU+48xTyib3n98pibKeiql1/93a4hneaDZuMjcdHVmIKJl+1u8ppcSi/XfQN6ZP7JGl evgJLnaolYz8Go7Z21gCx7Gx/U3/cbANj6NijRb4mealAKqkhouHvLTd3auGuANL1PJ+ 5Lfg== Received: by 10.58.137.34 with SMTP id qf2mr1082835veb.9.1348146882911; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:14:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.91.194 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:14:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jukka Zitting Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:14:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: On custom index configuration To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > i think it would be ideal if in most cases switching the internal lucene solution > for Solr/ES should work without having to touch anything beyond a few configs > (which can of course be stored inside the repo). That should be the case. > The example you are showing above seems to go into the opposite direction. Can you elaborate? The example doesn't affect any of the actual content, just the index configuration. In the case of an external index, the :index subtree wouldn't even be there as the index content would be stored outside the repository. BR, Jukka Zitting