Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E030ADA89 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65818 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 11:23:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 65609 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 11:23:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 65578 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2012 11:23:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:23:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.170] (HELO mail-vc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.220.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:22:57 +0000 Received: by vcbfk26 with SMTP id fk26so4058592vcb.1 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:22:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=5jG0Xti9zkvRIRr8QSvY5g4L+f6oyDlsiHYxtrFhxH0=; b=Ob0SEuGMb7icE3dxYA6yh7OLW/nFL4fKE0Du3J8LDo6pcv/vOkkORKaAMYOpYPC7dM D6zYHNwOsLyc9wAtG81QL1DCyrHxU4j5IVEimivpYSid314pc7gpSDziFbP7F5vI/F5v YENto83zwvhSXYU/IKjkORuAucl3r0xdxuRIBYW7alsBLyf1A2hGf/s1QgN3RbRy09yF YwHO4T0ZuW1VmdcV/7/mFIi3h/3pmNtq1zL5Fdg+qqVjz69dfOYSLKQ4CAQU2uBEYOCN 3yAnmuczrJhHNd45NjgpWE74i+fre004ouUWgFXwwHB+2YGN2hUnbYsXltHeXvh6Z0ha DXdA== Received: by 10.220.148.210 with SMTP id q18mr28298268vcv.6.1347448956930; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:22:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.91.194 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:22:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9C0FC4C8E9C29945B01766FC7F9D389816FE0B21FB@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com> References: <9C0FC4C8E9C29945B01766FC7F9D389816FE0B21F7@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com> <9C0FC4C8E9C29945B01766FC7F9D389816FE0B21FB@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:22:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ChildNodeEntry To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > I guess this is due to NodeState not knowing its name, but > on the other hand separating the name from the child > NodeState allows for enumerating the names only without > the need to actually load the states... Rigth. There are also the nice design aspects of not making a special case of the root node or having to worry about ensuring consistency constraints like name.equals(node.getChildNode(name).getName()). BR, Jukka Zitting