jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: On custom index configuration
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:20:42 GMT

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Ard Schrijvers
<a.schrijvers@onehippo.com> wrote:
> Writing it to local FS instead of memory would then also be an option,
> right?

Definitely. The current approach of loading the index binaries to
memory is just a temporary solution (the easiest thing that could
possibly work :-) that certainly won't scale to larger indexes. We'll
need to extend the binary value mechanism a bit to match features
(mostly random access) that Lucene needs.


Jukka Zitting

View raw message