On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org> wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>> ...Currently, Jackrabbit mostly considers the repository as a monolithic
>> unit of content, yet typical applications have widely varying
>> requirements when it comes to indexing, performance, observation,
>> eventual consistency etc. for various parts of their content. Being
>> able to have different settings for those various subtrees can make a
>> big difference IMO.
>
> if we can mount workspaces into other workspaces, then maybe configuration of this could
> still be tied to a workspace and not nodes in the tree....
Agreed, using workspaces in this way might work if the mounts are
transparent at the JCR level.
-Bertrand
|