jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-232) Hardcoded "childOrder" in NodeDelegate
Date Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:53:02 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13428046#comment-13428046

Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-232:

There already was an issue for this, OAK-169.
> Hardcoded "childOrder" in NodeDelegate
> --------------------------------------
>                 Key: OAK-232
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-232
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core, jcr
>            Reporter: angela
> there has been some discussion recently on how to deal with internal (hidden?) content

> such as for example the property reflecting the order of child nodes (see http://markmail.org/message/kzt7csiz2bd5n3ww).
> while working on some initial permission code i found that currently that property name
> is hardcoded in multiple places in NodeDelegate while at the same time the javadoc of
> NodeDelegate#getChildren refers to a different property name.
> until we reach consensus on how to deal with such internal content, if/how to hide it
> JCR API consumers and whether or not (and to which extend) that should be a implementation

> detail of oak-core, i would suggest to define at least a constant on PropertyState that
> allows to easily identify and adjust all usages.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message