Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 466E0D6D0 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73940 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2012 12:53:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 73899 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2012 12:53:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 73876 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2012 12:53:35 -0000 Received: from issues-vm.apache.org (HELO issues-vm) (140.211.11.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:53:35 +0000 Received: from isssues-vm.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by issues-vm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09EF140B94 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:53:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Michael Marth (JIRA)" To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: <2092161946.110307.1343393615725.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> In-Reply-To: <1291365879.110233.1343391154861.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (OAK-210) granularity of persisted data MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13423847#comment-13423847 ] Michael Marth commented on OAK-210: ----------------------------------- Do you see this as something to be implemented (or not) by each MK independently (i.e. something like an MK implementation detail)? > granularity of persisted data > ----------------------------- > > Key: OAK-210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mk > Reporter: Stefan Guggisberg > Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg > > the current persistence granularity is _single nodes_ (a node consists of properties and child node information). > instead of storing/retrieving single nodes it would IMO make sense to store subtree aggregates of specific nodes. the choice of granularity could be based on simple filter criteria (e.g. property value). > dynamic persistence granularity would help reducing the number of records and r/w operations on the underlying store, thus improving performance. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira