Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCF08D3C4 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23668 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2012 08:23:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 23553 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2012 08:23:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 23515 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2012 08:23:35 -0000 Received: from issues-vm.apache.org (HELO issues-vm) (140.211.11.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:23:35 +0000 Received: from isssues-vm.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by issues-vm (Postfix) with ESMTP id C967D14052D for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:23:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: <1774539574.74923.1342686214827.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> In-Reply-To: <721440085.18174.1334251998432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (OAK-64) Privilege Management MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13418161#comment-13418161 ] Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-64: ---------------------------------- bq. i would appreciate if you would at least state that your implementation is just a quick hack That's what I meant to do with my comment above. There are also TODOs in the code on properly handling persistence of changes and things like updating jcr:all. The reason why I opted for the bare minimum change for now is that I didn't want to start making more significant modifications while you were on vacation. If you have suggestions on how and where registered privileges should be persisted, I'd be happy to spend some time implementing them. > Privilege Management > -------------------- > > Key: OAK-64 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-64 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: core, jcr > Reporter: angela > Assignee: angela > > implement privilege management such as defined by jackrabbit API -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira