jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Assigned] (OAK-161) Refactor Tree#getChildStatus
Date Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:53:42 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Michael Dürig reassigned OAK-161:

    Assignee: Michael Dürig
> Refactor Tree#getChildStatus
> ----------------------------
>                 Key: OAK-161
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-161
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: Michael Dürig
> as discussed today Tree#getChildStatus is a bit problematic from my point 
> of view as it requires the parent Tree to be always accessible. as discussed 
> and stated multiple times in the past that may not be always the case.
> a part from the drawback it offers once we have access control in place
> it doesn't work for the root node, which doesn't have a parent by definition.
> therefore i would suggest to refactor the method to Tree#getStatus and make it
> an implementation detail if the status is stored with the parent or the tree
> itself.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message