jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Comment regarding TreeImpl#remove
Date Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:49:08 GMT

On 24.7.12 12:30, Angela Schreiber wrote:
> hi michael
> the implementation of Tree#remove starts with the following line:
>          if (!isRoot() && parent.hasChild(name)) {
> and it seems to me that testing for the parent containing the
> Tree that i am having at hand is superfluous. is that the
> leftover of a refactoring or could it really occur that in this
> situation parent.hasChild returns false? if the latter was
> true, i think this line deserves a little comment explaining
> to the poor reader what are the circumstances of that behaviour.
> maybe we would even need some log output for that special case.
> what do you think?

This is most probably a refactoring left over from rev. 1359334 and can 
be removed.


> angela

View raw message