jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-165) NodeDelegate should not use Tree.getChild() but rather Root.getTree()
Date Wed, 04 Jul 2012 14:15:35 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406543#comment-13406543
] 

Michael Dürig commented on OAK-165:
-----------------------------------

I share these concerns. However I don't see a better solution as long as we want to be able
to restrict access to parent nodes. The changes introduces through this issues a pretty trivial
so we can easily undo/refactor them once we have a clearer picture of access control. 
                
> NodeDelegate should not use Tree.getChild() but rather Root.getTree()
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-165
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-165
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jcr
>         Environment: {{Tree.getChild()}} is problematic wrt. to access control. {{Root.getTree()}}
should be used instead. 
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>            Assignee: Michael Dürig
>             Fix For: 0.4
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

Mime
View raw message