Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52243D4DA for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38393 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2012 09:20:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 38288 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2012 09:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 37372 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2012 09:20:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:20:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.178] (HELO mail-wi0-f178.google.com) (209.85.212.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:20:09 +0000 Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14so1666738wib.1 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:19:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=2i4uPzQKVU4snmJZkcAFhOQZHGhr95tIFKMmsKO8Zl4=; b=MexNuU6/d0AtpPqj7uwyjvdD7HmLXJHJu7M4O9gqx2ZtdqZv+nIPNqH3e9kx5AoLLH 8kuM+B/X4S3vx5uQtP6fQvioexIQnLzaUVz0APzThhL9AZIe3ItGrYbHzf/JoClmTgPm ORWBW0aqLI8NtaD7t8XDZP3EbOgwZaWX83jSynq3jQkT9YDRhX9gIkgXByfWi22qZ123 DN+00LMcGK7BaB4s0bUJDAPCJESqGMipJm1nhskANWroF41z1DsBQtAoLrsFzqN/+cNL YTnhV7BsJ4sR0chsw4rgLjSM43TGNGgc/yPBuDMC9MoYcDwJk2PR+T4PESxNF3GKBCKx KFdg== Received: by 10.180.100.37 with SMTP id ev5mr10434488wib.5.1341047988515; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:19:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.85.167 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:19:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4fee615765130_197de16792b@6d3fee33-2511-40bf-a350-f96f1e5031f6.mail> References: <4fee615765130_197de16792b@6d3fee33-2511-40bf-a350-f96f1e5031f6.mail> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 11:19:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Broken] apache/jackrabbit-oak#20 (trunk - 46d762b) To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Travis-CI wrote: > View the full build log and details: http://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds/1741471 The build says: Failed tests: readRevisions[2](org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.large.ManyRevisionsTest): 00000000000000c8..00000000000000c9: [] expected:<2> but was:<0> Can this be a result of the background garbage collector cleaning up the journal before ManyRevisionsTest has a chance to read them? If yes, I think we should either fix the test case or change the behavior of the garbage collector. In either case I think it would be a good idea to better define and document how long a client can expect revisions to remain available. BR, Jukka Zitting