Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D2829A7A for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 13:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78550 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 13:07:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 78523 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 13:07:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 78515 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2012 13:07:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 13:07:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 13:07:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E68F42BED2 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 13:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:06:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)" To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: <434483142.16970.1335964012257.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <416192320.16734.1335960168175.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (OAK-80) Implement batched writing for KernelNodeStore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-80?page=3Dcom.atlassian.jir= a.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D13266538= #comment-13266538 ]=20 Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-80: -------------------------------------- FWIW: > Personally I'd rather see such batching happening under the MicroKernel A= PI where the implementation actually knows about things like whether networ= k roundtrips are involved and what kind of batch sizes are most useful. i imagine that the implementation in the MK would be quite complicated (due= to the MVCC contract) whereas supporting batched writes in the upper layer= is probably not that difficult.=20 =20 > Implement batched writing for KernelNodeStore > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-80 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-80 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core > Affects Versions: 0.1 > Reporter: Michael D=C3=BCrig > Assignee: Michael D=C3=BCrig > > Currently KernelNodeStore and KernelNodeStateBuilder directly apply every= operation on the content tree to the private branch of the Microkernel. Th= ere have been some concerns re. performance hits due to network latency in = the case where the Microkernel is not co-located.=20 > I suggest to add batching capabilities such that operations are only writ= ten through to the Microkernel on certain limits.=20 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrato= rs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jsp= a For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira