jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org>
Subject Re: TCK vs unimplemented features (repository descriptors)
Date Sat, 05 May 2012 13:31:50 GMT


On 5.5.12 11:42, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> right now the repository descriptor claim support for a bunch of feature
> we don't have. This causes TCK tests to fail (and these are marked as
> failing in the pom).
>
> Among these, some are for feature we don't *plan* to implement (at least
> that's my assumption). I guess we should fix those.

Right. Let's fix these as we go.

>
> For the others (say: versioning), what should we do? I think it would be
> good to adjust them to reflect what oak-jcr does right now; this should
> make it easier to review the remaining TCK problems.

+1. The descriptors should reflect the current functionality, not the 
planned one. Let's put a TODO tag on descriptors of features we don't 
yet support but which we plan to support in the future.

Michael

>
> Feedback appreciated, Julian


Mime
View raw message