jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.2
Date Thu, 03 May 2012 08:42:09 GMT


On 3.5.12 9:08, Alex Parvulescu wrote:
> So we can consider the vote has failed due to the licencing issue.

Yes.


>
> I see that we already have one commit on the trunk, so in order to minimize
> the noise maybe cutting 0.3 at the end of may is a better option?

If it is only about the noise I don't mind. I'd actually prefer to retry 
the release. This will get us going with the process and help us sorting 
out potential issues with it. If it is a matter of resources and time, 
I'm fine with skipping it.

Michael


>
> alex
>
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Mueller<mueller@adobe.com>  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> The troublesome files come with the following header:
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * Copyright 2004-2011 H2 Group. Multiple-Licensed under the H2 License,
>>> * Version 1.0, and under the Eclipse Public License, Version 1.0
>>> * (http://h2database.com/html/license.html).
>>> * Initial Developer: H2 Group
>>> */
>>>
>>> I suppose they may well have originally written by Thomas and that he
>>> could simply relicense them to the ASF, but until then we should treat
>>> them as EPLv1 code and mention that in the LICENSE.txt file.
>>
>> Yes, that was a mistake. I wrote those two classes originally, so I can
>> relicense them. I have done that in revision 1333334.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message