Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B319C372 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31808 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2012 12:11:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 31769 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2012 12:11:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 31760 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2012 12:11:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:11:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fmeschbe@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.208] (HELO exprod6og107.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:11:16 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob107.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT5qMzue2Sk920vLA30078NxsuRqEWNXT@postini.com; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:10:55 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q3RC8jJ0003389 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q3RCAoYs004484 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.30) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:10:50 -0700 Received: from eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.32]) by eurhub01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.30]) with mapi; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:10:48 +0100 From: Felix Meschberger To: "oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:10:50 +0100 Subject: Re: Consolidate oak Utilities Thread-Topic: Consolidate oak Utilities Thread-Index: Ac0kbsgnKTSOqD4qSxa5Ih+OKdUowA== Message-ID: References: <4F9A7006.2050802@adobe.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi, Am 27.04.2012 um 12:39 schrieb Jukka Zitting: > For example (and I know this has been discussed at length already), > much of the path and json/p handling code shared between -core and -mk > is just there to first generate jsop strings and then parse them > again. It's obviously good to avoid duplicating such code, but even > better if we could avoid it in the first place. Which would be an argument of non-stringly typed MK API and leave serializa= tion stuff to be internals of any MK API implementation -- be it for actual= persistence or for a remoting layer... Regards Felix=