Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48628C7A3 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57858 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2012 15:10:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 57826 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2012 15:10:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 57797 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2012 15:10:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:10:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.50] (HELO mail-wg0-f50.google.com) (74.125.82.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:10:12 +0000 Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so790076wgb.19 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:09:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=AbS+kfgi7TXhJQ2vwA32PtIuQiBvI+O4NPo9axUepvs=; b=MsNcN3FjN7m79UU+8fd97Vt+bNtPw3zcULFPkiPLEoOOh2GfXOFc9oM95FLy83Xpvt HiaYeTmtmF5Zycvels3MyIyPHyfpyLUf42y2pWmGrd+eEjuH6zKSzfAqtVvJdQ88vExx gwYmNBpi/11N2hGT5tO4h8nkOE9gqzLJhsPn5iD9fMikRN3nnwT704zJSL7DD0lXwbNY Lp/dd1t7YOVuIDYQp5csnDJGBny7CCPtaO0mTA/07sQY/bx0QWBEVxNvuhNLNpCKufpp 6gopqWeiLMXV53lu4hsujepkd66jQUKJfpRgbRewOlSxA5WUfyWOi1TqNEZSsAucYYB+ An2A== Received: by 10.180.79.135 with SMTP id j7mr6776245wix.19.1335539392325; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:09:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.146.133 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:09:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F9A79DB.8090404@adobe.com> References: <4F9A79DB.8090404@adobe.com> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:09:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: (Re-)Moving mk packages from oak-core to oak-mk To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Angela Schreiber wrote: > is anybody working on this? or does anybody know what was the > status of that issue? can we remove those packages altogether or > are the parts that need to be moved to the mk-module? Most of those packages are earlier MK work by Thomas. There's still quite a bit of useful stuff there like the various wrappers that are conceptually closer to oak-core than oak-mk, but they'd need to be updated to match the direction that the internals of oak-core have lately evolved towards. AFAIUI nobody is currently actively working on that code, but I wouldn't like to just remove them until we've either refactored or replicated the existing functionality in there. If people find the .mk package in -core confusing, we could for example rename the package to something like .todo until someone does a more thorough cleanup of the code. BR, Jukka Zitting