jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: JCR<->MK property mapping
Date Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:20:20 GMT
On 2012-04-25 12:12, Michael Dürig wrote:
>
>
> On 25.4.12 12:01, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2012-04-25 11:48, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am 25.04.2012 um 11:40 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Julian
>>>> Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>> Would it make sense to "optimize" the persistence in that we
>>>>> wouldn't store
>>>>> the primary type when it happens to be nt:unstructured?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, though the default type should be something like
>>>> "oak:unstructured" or "jr3:unstructured" that isn't orderable like
>>>> "nt:unstructured".
>>>
>>> Do we need a namespace ? How about just "Unstructured" ?
>>
>> a) I wouldn't be surprised if there's code out there assuming that
>> namespace names are always prefixed.
>>
>> b) Having "nt:unstructured" and "Unstructured" be different is ...
>> surprising. So we probably want a different term...
>
> ((nt:)?void | (nt:)?any | (nt:)?unknown | (nt:)?node | (nt:)?top)?

I like "any".


Mime
View raw message