jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org>
Subject Re: JCR<->MK property mapping
Date Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:12:10 GMT


On 25.4.12 12:01, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-04-25 11:48, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 25.04.2012 um 11:40 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Julian
>>> Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> Would it make sense to "optimize" the persistence in that we
>>>> wouldn't store
>>>> the primary type when it happens to be nt:unstructured?
>>>
>>> Yes, though the default type should be something like
>>> "oak:unstructured" or "jr3:unstructured" that isn't orderable like
>>> "nt:unstructured".
>>
>> Do we need a namespace ? How about just "Unstructured" ?
>
> a) I wouldn't be surprised if there's code out there assuming that
> namespace names are always prefixed.
>
> b) Having "nt:unstructured" and "Unstructured" be different is ...
> surprising. So we probably want a different term...

((nt:)?void | (nt:)?any | (nt:)?unknown | (nt:)?node | (nt:)?top)?

Michael

Mime
View raw message